Jon Tennant, [in a reposting of his comments](http://fossilsandshit.com/collaboration-without-elsevier-is-the-key-to-open-access-and-open-science/) on a [disingenuous, Elsevier-penned *Times Higher Ed* piece](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/43956):
> When Elsevier uses words like ‘sustainable’, I do not think it means what it thinks they mean. The term ‘sustainable’ means maintaining Elsevier’s 37% profit margins and projected growth. Everyone else means not wasting hundreds of millions of dollars and more on a for-profit publisher that continues to aggressively mislead its customers, and lobby against progressive OA models, when a number of better, non-profit, community-led initiatives exist.
Tennant is—as he should be—merciless.